Medical Records and Rule 26 Expert Disclosures

April 3, 2026

by | Apr 21, 2022

How to use medical records effectively at the Rule 26 expert disclosure stage in personal injury Cases

 

a. Send/Review all records to expert

What is sent to a Rule 26 expert? The short answer, as it pertains to medical records, is everything conceivably relevant or important. Summaries and indexes should be included because you cannot expect an expert to pour over every page and of course only a few parts of the records are key documents to the issues in the case.

b. Page citations in expert reports

Whether its a Rule 26 disclosure prepared and sent by the attorney or a Rule 26 expert report for a testifying or treating physician it is important to:  cite to the factual record; cite the source for each factual statement (and this may require a page cite after every sentence); cite to deposition page and lines; and critically, cite to  each medical record by  author, date, and  Bates #.

b. Draft Reports

In communicating with a medical expert there will inevitably be a discussion of what is in the medical records ¾ pointing out the key sections or chart entries. These communications preceding any expert report are privileged and not subject to discovery, including draft reports.

On December 2, 2010 Rules 26(a)(4)(B) and (C) were amended to provide work- product protection to draft expert reports and, with three exceptions, attorney- expert communications. These rules provide:

Trial Preparation Protection for Draft Reports or Disclosures. Rules 26(b)(3)(A) and (B) protect drafts of any report or disclosure required under Rule 26(a)(2), regardless of the form of the draft.

Trial Preparation Protection for Communications Between Partys Attorney and Expert Witnesses. Rules 26(b)(3)(A) and (B) protect communications between the partys attorney and any witness required to provide a report under Rule 26(a)(2)(B), regardless of the form of the communications, except to the extent that the communications:

(i) relate to compensation for the experts study or testimony;

(ii) identify facts or data that the partys attorney provided and that the expert considered in forming the opinions to be expressed; or

(iii) identify assumptions that the partys attorney provided and that the expert relied upon in forming the opinions to be expressed.

For more information on the effective use of medical records in personal injury cases see:

How to properly obtain medical records

Reviewing and Organizing Medical Records

Obtaining electronic medical records (EMR)

Medical Records in Depositions and at Trial

 

A blue circular badge with three white stars and the text
Red brick courthouse with a central statue, side tower, and a church steeple in the background on a sunny day.
October 19, 2026
On 10/20/10 the Tennessee Supreme Court reinstated a jury verdict obtained by David Randolph Smith & Associates for the widow of a Tennessee Army National Guard sergeant who died in 2000. The jury had awarded $7.2 million in the Tennessee wrongful death lawsuit against River Park Hospital of McMinnville. The Tennessee Supreme Court’s reinstatement of the verdict resulted in a total award, with interest, of $10.7 million. Warren County court officials said the multimillion-dollar judgment was the largest amount awarded by a jury in county history at the time of its award.A copy of the opinion is available here.
The logo
October 19, 2026
Settlement in significant wrongful death case filed in Overton County, Tennessee in a mediation held in Nashville, Tennessee on July 25, 2005. The case involved the failure to treat and diagnose group b strep in a pregnant mother whose child was brain damaged and ultimately died from sepsis stemming from exposure to the group b strep during labor. The terms of the settlement are confidential.The firm is currently handling another group b strep medical malpractice case in state court in Tupelo, Mississippi.